I just want to give a little recap of my
blog so far.
I started off with intentions and
aspirations of looking at green buildings and the benefits and hazards of high
rise living.
However, after reading a fascinating
article on the Compact City Fallacy, I changed my angle.
I looked at urban sprawl in both Sydney and
Canberra, and compared them to the density of Shanghai. I then went on a number
of tangents, looking at Canberra from a variety of angles, and have settled on
looking at the impact in the push for cycling in cities.
First I touched on the wonderful Vienna,
and its 1200km of cycle paths. I would like to explore Vienna and other cycle
friendly cities, but for now I want to briefly discuss Sydney again and its
cycle paths.

While I am yet to fully comprehend how
important cycle paths and riding your bike are in terms of the environmental
and social impact, I know that cars are not the answer for the future sustainability of cities.
So my new tangent will be to discuss
alternatives to cars as transport within cities. Let’s start with one of man’s
greatest of inventions, the bicycle.
For the rest of this blog, I wanted to
deliver a stinging critique to Sydney and its feeble attempts at integrating
cycling into the city. `
Sydney, as I have touched on, is a cyclist’s
nightmare of high traffic, narrow roads and hot-headed drivers. However, there
are a few brave and hardy souls who ride through the CBD to get to work, which is discussed here.
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/theurbanist/2013/08/21/is-cycling-more-dangerous-than-driving/
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/theurbanist/2013/08/21/is-cycling-more-dangerous-than-driving/
In a recent article, it was revealed that
one of the few workable and decent bike lanes on College Street, was to be shut
down by the Roads Minister in Duncan Gay. To counter this decision, Gay is
attempting to create an alternative route through Castlereagh Street.
**Have a look at the article here, and be outraged.
**Have a look at the article here, and be outraged.
However, along certain sections of
Castlereagh Street there are carparks and loading zones. Gay has suggested a
‘part-time’ bike lane, which would be shut during the day, and opened in peak
times.
Is he kidding?
Sydney’s half-hearted attempts at bringing
in cycle paths are pathetic. How would anyone consider selling their car to
ride there bike to work and catch public transport everywhere?
As someone who rides regularly, and who
understands the benefits and savings of riding bikes, it is frustrating that
Sydney has not done more about making cycling and other alternatives of
transport more appealing.
Due to the fact that I do love riding, I
want to explore cycling and bikes as a viable alternative to cars within
cities. I have a number of articles and papers that I want to read and discuss.
Following on from there, I want to look at other methods of transport that are
more sustainable.
Hi Murray. Great article. As a fellow cyclist who wishes to be able to safety ride to work in Sydney's CBD, I certainly emphasize with the point of this piece. I just wonder if perhaps you have focused on the simple points and avoided the hard ones that need to be solved to make a more bike-friendly city.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, car uses contribute a lot of extra government revenue including fuel tax, registration, paid parking etc. Should cyclists be expected to contribute more if they wish to enjoy the benefits of public infrastructure?
Secondly, if we want safety on the roads, surely cyclists have to be law-abiding and accountable, just like drivers. At the moment, some cyclists ride on footpaths and across pedestrian crossing, yet they also want to switch to roads and bike paths when it is more convenient for them. The unregulated, unpredictable nature of urban cycling makes it dangerous; especially if numbers are to increase. Furthermore, cyclists speed, fail to give way and stop at red lights and ignore pedestrian crossings, yet there is no system of registration or identification.
I think it would be great if you could channel your passion for cycling towards proposing some solutions to the more nuanced, complicated parts of the conversation.
Hi Matt,
DeleteThanks for reading my blog and an even bigger thanks for posting something!
You make a very valid and interesting point.
I agree with aspects of your argument, but I strongly disagree with others.
I will dedicate an entire blog post to answering your question.
Keep on reading,
Murray
ReplyDeleteHi Murray - like the blog. You might want to read this article about our esteemed NSW Minister for Roads - he holds some interesting views! http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/duncan-gay-wanted-to-ban-all-carshare-spots-on-the-street-get-rid-of-gardens-for-parking-20150325-1m3w7n.html
Thanks Margaret, always appreciate some commentary on my blogging.
DeleteI have looked at that article, it seems like an interesting tactic.
I'm not sure what he is trying to achieve but it doesn't appear to be very popular!